A total of eighty-four mapping cruises were conducted on Maryland water bodies. The spatial extent of water quality was measured on the following rivers: the Bohemia, Corsica, Elk, Honga, Northeast, Patapsco, and Sassafras. Two open-water segments of the Chesapeake Bay, designated CBSEG_2003 CB1TF and CBSEG_2003 CB3MH, were also surveyed.
Multiple surveys were required to map three of the larger water bodies. Data from the Upper and Lower Patapsco River surveys were combined. Similarly, data acquired on the Upper and Lower Susquehanna Flats surveys were used to map segment CBTF1, the Upper Chesapeake Bay. Data collected during the Eastern and Western surveys of Chesapeake Bay segment CBMH3 were combined.
Water quality mapping was conducted using DATAFLOW, a compact, self-contained surface water quality mapping system deployed in a small boat operating at planing speeds of up km/hr (25 kts) or less. Measurements were made approximately every four seconds, or 30 meters (100 feet). Seven water quality parameters were measured: water temperature, salinity, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, fluorescence and pH. Water depth was also measured. The DATAFLOW system sampled water at approximately 0.5-m depths below the surface.
Additional water-quality measurements were made at sixty calibration stations. During each mapping cruise, "grab" samples were collected at five or six stations per water body segment. Calibration samples were collected, after stopping the boat, at 0.5-m depth and filtered on site. Secchi depth, HydroLab and photosynthetic active radiation measurements were made at the same time.
Laboratory analyses were performed on calibration samples. Chlorophyll a, total dissolved nitrogen, particulate nitrogen, nitrite, nitrite + nitrate, ammonium, total dissolved phosphorus, particulate phosphorus, orthophosphate, dissolved organic carbon, particulate carbon, total suspended solids and volatile suspended solids were determined.
Water quality mapping provides data on variability and patchiness that is valuable in assessing water quality criteria, and in determining attainment of those criteria. For example, spatial information on turbidity can be correlated to the spatial coverage of living resources such as Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV). This information can be used to determine and assess water clarity criteria necessary to support SAV growth, address the progress of meeting SAV restoration goals, and target specific locations for SAV restoration.
Spatially intensive data can also help pinpoint localized areas of water quality concern, such as areas of low dissolved oxygen that can cause fish kills, and their possible links to nearby land uses or point sources.
Water quality maps can capture localized areas of algae blooms, high turbidity, or low dissolved oxygen that may adversely affect living resources in shallow water habitats and spawning areas.
Spatial data can also be aggregated across watershed units to aid in the evaluation of entire systems. Water quality mapping data are integrated with data from other Bay water quality stations and living resources monitoring projects and used to understand linkages, temporal variation and long-term trends.
Water quality data are used to refine, calibrate and validate Chesapeake Bay ecological models. The models are used to develop and assess water quality criteria with the goal of removing the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal rivers from the list of impaired waters.
Data users who desire very detailed information about Water Quality Monitoring data-definition, sampling-procedures and data-processing are encouraged to refer to the two documents listed below. The documents may be obtained from The Chesapeake Bay Program Office.
Water Quality Database - Database Design and Data Dictionary, Prepared For: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, Chesapeake Bay Program Office, January 2004.[<http://archive.chesapeakebay.net/pubs/cbwqdb2004_RB.PDF]>.
The most current version of the Water Quality Data Dictionary - Online may be found at: [<http://archive.chesapeakebay.net/data/data_dict.cfm?DB_CODE=CBP_WQDB]>.
Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Chesapeake Bay Shallow Water Quality Monitoring Program, for the period July 1, 2009 - June 30, 2010. [<http://mddnr.chesapeakebay.net/eyesonthebay/documents/SWM_QAPP_2009_2010_Draft1.pdf>]
The Nutrient Analytical Services Laboratory (NASL) at the Chesapeake Biological Laboratory (University of Maryland) analyzed chlorophyll, nutrient and suspended solids samples.
The project was made possible with funding provided by the State of Maryland, the United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program, and the National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration Chesapeake Bay Program Office.
MD DNR followed specific procedures to ensure that the DATAFLOW component of the Shallow Water Quality Monitoring Program project design was properly implemented and managed with sufficient accuracy, precision and detection limits. Accuracy (closeness to the true value) of collected data was controlled and assured by the proper use, calibration and maintenance of both field and laboratory equipment for the measurement of physical and chemical parameters.
YSI 6600 sondes were configured with the following probes: 6560, 6561, 6562, 6136 and 6562 or 6150ROX. During April through June 2009, 6562 Clark cell Dissolved Oxygen probes were used. From July through October 2009, 6150ROX Optical Dissolved Oxygen probes were used.
Resolution, range and accuracy specifications for the sonde and probes may be obtained from the manufacturer. <http://www.ysi.com/environmental-monitoring/data-acquisition.htm>
The procedures to control and assure the accuracy of field measurements involved the calibration of field instruments, the verification of calibrations, equipment maintenance, and collection of filter blanks. Most of the details of how data acquired with YSI sondes were quality assured and quality controlled are described in process description elements in the Lineage portion of this metadata record. The results of the water quality attributes analyzed in the laboratories were also used to calibrate and crosscheck the sonde data for accuracy.
PAR sensors were returned to LICOR, Inc. prior to the field season for factory calibration.
Daily quality control checks (including the running of blanks and standards) were used to control and assure laboratory accuracy.
Accuracy of Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Nutrient Analytical Services Laboratory (CBL NASL) results was also assessed through DNR's participation in the Chesapeake Bay Coordinated Split Sample Program (CSSP), a split sampling program in which five laboratories involved in Chesapeake Bay monitoring analyze the coordinated split samples. CSSP was established in June 1989 to establish a measure of comparability between sampling and analytical operations for water quality monitoring throughout the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. DNR followed the protocols in the Chesapeake Bay Coordinated Split Sample Program Implementation Guidelines (EPA 1991) and its revisions. Split samples were collected quarterly. Results were analyzed by appropriate statistical methods to determine if results differed significantly among labs. If a difference occurred, discussions began regarding techniques and potential methods changes to resolve discrepancies.
Additionally, CBL NASL participated two times per year in the United States Geologic Survey (USGS) Standard Reference Sample Project.
OTHER ATTRIBUTE ACCURACY INFORMATION
Turbid water was noted in the vessel log at 10:58 during the 7-May-2009 Northeast River survey. Very clear water was noted in the vessel log at 8:56 during the Susquehanna North 1-Oct-2009 survey.
See note on Susquehanna North station XKH0375 sample collection location in Logical_Consistency element for this metadata record.
There were instances when pH probe post-calibration values were outside of acceptable range during 2009.
April 2009 Bohemia- pH 10 post cal out of range Elk- pH 10 post cal out of range
May 2009 Corsica- pH 10 post cal out of range by 7.5% but YSI pH and Hydrolab pH matched up on field sheets Northeast- pH 10 post cal out of range by 7.5% but YSI pH and Hydrolab pH matched up on field sheets Lower Patapsco- pH 7 and 10 post cal out of range by but YSI pH and Hydrolab pH matched up on field sheets CB3MH East- pH 7 and 10 post cal out of range but YSI pH and Hydrolab pH matched up on field sheets
June 2009 Susquehanna South- pH 10 post cal out of range Elk- pH 10 post cal out of range Honga- pH 7 and 10 post cal out of range Bohemia- pH 7 and 10 post cal out of range Upper Patapsco- pH 10 off by 4% CB3MH East- pH 10 off by 4%
July 2009 Honga- pH 10 post cal out of range by 6%
Two DataFlow system computers were used during the 22-Apr-2009 survey. The timestamp of the first record logged by the second computer was 09:51:27.
Severe weather conditions made it necessary to modify cruise tracks on several surveys: the April Corsica and Lower Patapsco River surveys; the May Northeast and Sassafras River surveys; the CB3MHW June and the Susquehanna South October survey.
Navigation restrictions due to military operations resulted in deviation from normal cruise tracks during the Susquehanna South May and August surveys.
During the Corsica River June 2009 cruise; low water conditions prevented the survey vessel from entering Alder Branch and Emory Creek.
System configuration errors resulted in an increase in the logging interval, normally 4-seconds, to every eight-seconds during the May Susquehanna North and Northeast River surveys and during the, June Sassafras and Corsica River surveys.
During the Susquehanna North October survey, calibration samples were collected 0.25 nm Southeast of the location of station XKH0375.
Configuration issues resulted in depth data not being logged during the July Sassafras and Corsica River surveys and part of the Honga River survey.
During the Lower Patapsco May survey, the cruise track was altered to render assistance to another DNR sampling crew. Rendering assistance to boaters in distress between 11:02 and 11:31 resulted in a cruise track deviation during the July Bohemia River survey.
A probe malfunction during the May Sassafras River survey caused all pH data from the survey to be rejected.
Sampling-event and water-quality-calibration pigment, nutrient and suspended solid data from sixty stations are included in the dataset.
Five calibration samples were collected during each of the following monthly sampling runs: Bohemia, CB3MH East, CB3MH West, Corsica, Elk, Honga, Northeast, Patapsco Lower, Patapsco Upper, Sassafras, Susquehanna North, and Susquehanna South.
Contour maps based on 2009 Dissolved Oxygen, Salinity, Turbidity, Temperature and Chlorophyll data acquired during DATAFLOW monthly mapping cruises are available on-line. [<http://mddnr.chesapeakebay.net/sim/dataflow_data.cfm]>.
The user may discover a few interruptions in sonde datasets. These were related to short-term problems with flow, power or sonde operation.
Aquatic plants obstructing water flow through DataFlow system resulted in data gaps on a number of surveys. No-flow events occurred on the Susquehanna North May, July, August, September and October surveys. Flow was also obstructed by submerged plants during the Elk River June, July, August, and September and Northeast River September and October and the Bohemia October cruises.
Turbidity data were censored in cases where bottom sediment disturbances were determined to be caused by the sampling vessel or other vessels.
Power failures were the source of data gaps during the following cruises: the June Northeast River, Elk River, and section CB3MHW surveys; the July Northeast River, Lower Patapsco River, Bohemia River and section CB3MHWsurveys; the August Northeast River and Lower Patapsco River surveys; and the September Sassafras River survey.
The Dataflow system pump failed and resulted in early termination of the Lower Patapsco July survey. Problems with the system pump resulted in a data gap during the Sassafras River September survey.
A data sonde cable connection problem resulted in a data gap during the CB3MHW October survey.
Multiple instances of an unknown problem caused the DataFlow computer to shut down resulting in data gaps in the Corsica River September survey. The cruise track was altered to re-survey the part that was not recorded during the first passage. Computer shut down issues were also experienced during the CB3MHW September cruise and the Susquehanna South October cruise.
All other missing attribute values were masked because the data were determined to be unreliable during the quality control process.
Since 2008, silicates were not included in the suite of samples collected at calibration sample stations.
YSI 6600 data sondes equipped with a 6560 conductivity/temperature probe, a 6136 turbidity probe, a 6025 chlorophyll probe and either a 6562 (Clark cell) Dissolved Oxygen probe or a 6150ROX (Optical) Dissolved Oxygen probe were maintained and calibrated before and after each deployment in accordance with YSI recommendations. <http://www.ysi.com/environmental-monitoring/data-acquisition.htm>
CONTINUOUS SURFACE WATER QUALITY MAPPING:
DATAFLOW Mapping System DATAFLOW is a compact, self-contained surface water quality mapping system, suitable for use in a small boat operating at planing speeds of about 25 knots. The system collects water through a pipe ("ram") deployed on the transom of the vessel, pumps it through an array of water quality sensors, and then discharges the water overboard. Orientation of the sonde vertically, with probes upward, ensures that no air bubbles are conveyed to the sensors, preventing errors that might be caused by such bubbles.
Water quality instrumentation consisted of a YSI 6600 Sonde equipped with a flow-through chamber. Sensors included a YSI 6560 conductivity/temperature probe, a 6136 turbidity probe, a 6025 chlorophyll probe and either a Clark-type YSI 6562 DO probe or a 6150ROX (Optical) Dissolved Oxygen probe. The sonde transmitted data collected from the sensors to a YSI 650 data logger.
Positioning and depth instrumentation consisted of a Garmin GPS/MAP 168 Sounder. The data logger matched the position data with water-quality sensor data for each observation. The Garmin 168 GPS transmitted NMEA data to a small form factor computer. A DATAFLOW/Labview program was used to merge position and depth data with data collected by the logger and create an output file.
The system was equipped with an inline flow meter. Although the flow rate did not affect sensor readings, decreased flow was an indication of either a partial blockage or an interruption of water flow to the instrument. Flow data were used in the field as a diagnostic tool to ensure that the system was working properly and, later, as a quality assurance tool to verify that water flow was uninterrupted. A boat horn was wired to the flow meter. If the flow-rate fell below 3.0 L s-1, the horn sounded and warned operators that a problem needed to be corrected.
Cruise tracks varied depending on the water body being mapped. In general, a square-wave pattern was followed by alternately sampling shallow shoreline areas, and open, deeper waters while traveling up and down river. Alternative cruise paths were followed if water body size, shape impediments, or obstructions dictated otherwise. Cruise patterns were selected to obtain representative coverage of shallow water habitats and open waters so that segment-wide criteria could be assessed as accurately as possible. Navigational issues and placement of representative calibration sites also determined ultimate cruise tracks.
WATER QUALITY CALIBRATION SAMPLES:
At each calibration station, "grab" water quality samples were collected from the outflow of the DATAFLOW unit.
The grab samples were collected at the same time as the HydroLab surface sample was recorded. Numbered two quart bottles were triple-rinsed and filled with water for "whole" and "filtered" nutrient and chlorophyll samples.
Nutrient, pigment and suspended-solid water-samples were filtered on station or shortly thereafter. Sample waters and filters were placed on ice immediately after filtration.
Particulate samples included: Chlorophyll, Particulate Carbon, Particulate Nitrogen, Particulate Phosphorus (PP), Particulate Inorganic Phosphorous (PIP), Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Volatile Suspended Solids (VSS).
Filtrate collected from TSS/VSS or PP/PIP filtrations was used for dissolved nutrient samples. Nitrate, Nitrite, Ammonia, Orthophosphate and Dissolved Organic Carbon samples were collected.
HYDROLAB PROFILE:
The first reading of the HydroLab water-column profile at each Calibration station was recorded at the same time the water quality "grab" sample was collected. The first HydroLab record logged was for the 0.5-meter depth. The sonde was then lowered to the bottom. A reading was taken at 0.3-meters above the bottom. The sonde was raised and measurements were recorded at 0.5-meter or 1.0-meter increments until it reached the surface. (In cases where station depth was greater than 3-meters, the sonde was raised in 1-meter increments).
SECCHI DEPTH:
Secchi Disk Depth was measured at each calibration station. Readings with the Secchi disk were made in situ without the aid of sunglasses. The Secchi disk was lowered into the water, on the shady side of the boat, and the depth at which it was no longer visible was recorded. The Secchi depth reading was taken near the stern of the vessel, and the time at which the reading was taken was noted (to the second) from the Global Positioning System. This facilitated later matching of Secchi depth readings with turbidity probe data.
PAR MEASUREMENT:
Underwater Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR, 400-700nm)
At each calibration station, down-welling light penetrating the water column (PAR) was measured underwater at several depths to calculate the light attenuation coefficient, Kd. Simultaneous deck and submersed PAR intensity measurements were taken to account for variability in incident surface irradiance due to changes in cloud cover. Data collected from this procedure were used to estimate the depth of the photic zone.
The equipment used was manufactured by LI-COR, Inc. and consisted of a LI-192SA, flat cosine Underwater Quantum Sensor, a LI-190SA air (deck) reference sensor and a Data Logger (LI-1000 or LI-1400).
Deck and underwater readings were recorded simultaneously. Readings were allowed to stabilize before being recorded. If the station depth was less than 3 meters, readings were taken at 0.1 meter and at 0.25-meter intervals until 10% of the 0.1-meter reading was reached. If the station depth was greater than 3 meters, a reading was taken at 0.1-meter and at 0.5-meter intervals until 10% of the 0.1-meter reading was reached.
DATAFLOW FILE POST-PROCESSING:
Each raw .txt file, created by DATAFLOW/LabView during 2009 mapping cruises on all water bodies was post-processed in the following manner.
Each file was opened in Excel and renamed. Rows of data acquired before and after mapping were deleted. Records (if any) were also deleted if they did not have associated GPS values. A macro was executed. The macro rearranged columns and inserted error-tracking columns and headings. Next, negative values were flagged, and values outside each parameter's normal range were highlighted. The macro also returned a form summarizing exceedances. Finally, mapping cruise event and instrument information were appended to each record.
Flagged values were evaluated. Common anomalies included spikes in fluorescence and turbidity, dips in specific conductance, and extremely high dissolved oxygen readings. Instrument post-calibration results, in situ comparisons with HydroLab, LI-COR readings, historical data from nearby locations, and survey-crew remarks were used to determine whether sensor values were acceptable.
In cases where data were determined to be unreliable, the reason(s) values were determined to be "bad" were documented with error codes and comments. Unreliable data were masked. No data were discarded. All DATAFLOW data for each mapping cruise, both "good" and "bad", were retained in an archival file. Only data considered reliable were published in reports.
VERIFICATION AND DATA MANAGEMENT:
At the end of the monitoring season, DNR Tawes Office and Field Office personnel conducted additional data QA/QC procedures. All of the water quality calibration "grab" sample data were plotted. Outliers and anomalous values were thoroughly researched. Staff compared unusual values to historic values from the site and values from nearby sites in the Bay. Weather events were considered, event logs were reviewed and field staff were consulted regarding possible legitimate causes for outlying values. In cases where values were not considered to be legitimate, they were masked from the published dataset with the approval of the field staff and the Quality Assurance Officer.
University of Maryland's Chesapeake Biological Laboratory (CBL), Nutrient Analytical Services Laboratory (NASL) analyzed total dissolved nitrogen, particulate nitrogen, nitrite, nitrite + nitrate, ammonium, total dissolved phosphorus, particulate phosphorus, particulate inorganic phosphorus, orthophosphate, dissolved organic carbon, particulate carbon, total suspended solids, and volatile suspended solids.
Beginning in 2009, NASL also performed chlorophyll analyses. Prior to 2009, chlorophyll analyses were performed by the Maryland Department of Mental Health and Hygiene.
Further information about laboratory analytical procedures may be obtained from the "Process_Contact".
The data are contained in five related entities (tables): Station_Information, Monitoring_Event_Data, Water_Quality_Data, Light_Attenuation_Data and SONDE_DATA. Each table contains attributes (fields).
The entity Station_Information is comprised of the attributes: STATION, DESCRIPTION, WATER_BODY, CBP_BASIN, TS_BASIN, BASIN, CBSEG_2003, CBSEG_2003_DESCRIPTION, HUC8, CATALOGING_UNIT_DESCRIPTION, HUC11, WATERSHED, FIPS, STATE, COUNTY/CITY, FALL_LINE, LATITUDE, LONGITUDE, LL_DATUM, UTM_X and UTM_Y
The entity Monitoring_Event_Data is comprised of the attributes: EVENT_ID, SOURCE, AGENCY, PROGRAM, PROJECT, STATION, EVENT_START_DATE, EVENT_START_TIME, CRUISE, TOTAL_DEPTH, UPPER_PYCNOCLINE, LOWER_PYCNOCLINE, AIR_TEMP, WIND_SPEED, WIND_DIRECTION, PRECIP_TYPE, TIDE_STAGE, WAVE_HEIGHT, CLOUD_COVER, GAGE_HEIGHT, PRESSURE, FLOW_STAGE, DETAILS and WATER_BODY.
The entity Water_Quality_Data is comprised of the attributes: EVENT_ID, SOURCE, PROJECT, STATION, SAMPLE_DATE, SAMPLE_TIME, DEPTH, LAYER, SAMPLE_TYPE, SAMPLE_ID, PARAMETER, QUALIFIER, VALUE, UNIT, METHOD, LAB, PROBLEM, DETAILS, TOTAL_DEPTH, UPPER_PYCNOCLINE, LOWER_PYCNOCLINE, LAT, and LONG.
The entity Light_Attenuation_Data is comprised of the attributes: EVENT_ID, SOURCE, PROJECT, STATION, SAMPLE_DATE, SAMPLE_TIME, SAMPLE_REPLICATE_TYPE, DEPTH, EPAR_S, EPARU_Z, EPARD_Z, UNIT, METHOD, DETAILS, WATER_BODY, TOTAL_DEPTH, UPPER_PYCNOCLINE, and LOWER_PYCNOCLINE.
++++++++++++++++++++ DRAFT -TO BE DETERMINED when data are served by Chesapeake Bay Program
The entity SONDE_DATA is comprised of the attributes: SAMPLE_DATE, SAMPLE_TIME, WATER_BODY, SECTION, PRI_SEG, SONDE, LATITUDE, LONGITUDE, TOTAL_DEPTH, BOAT_SPEED, BATT, WTEMP, SPCOND, SALINITY, DO_SAT, DO, PH, TURB_NTU, FLUOR, TCHL_PRE_CAL and COMMENTS.
+++++++++++++++++++++
Maps created by interpolating the Dissolved Oxygen, Turbidity, Chlorophyll a, Salinity and Temperature data acquired during mapping cruises may be downloaded from <http://mddnr.chesapeakebay.net/sim/dataflow_data.cfm>
The most current version of the Water Quality Data Dictionary - Online may be found at: [<http://archive.chesapeakebay.net/data/data_dict.cfm?DB_CODE=CBP_WQDB]>.
Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Chesapeake Bay Shallow Water Quality Monitoring Program, for the period July 1, 2009 - June 30, 2010. [<http://mddnr.chesapeakebay.net/eyesonthebay/documents/SWM_QAPP_2009_2010_Draft1.pdf>]